Though they have never been explicitly compared to real weeds, surrogate weeds have been used for decades as substitutes for problem agricultural weeds in studies of physical weed control efficacy. In order to develop effective alternatives to herbicides, physical weed control implements must be designed to be more effective and less variable. To this end, efficiency in research tactics is imperative, but is it detrimental to depend on crop species used as stand-ins for weeds rather than the real thing?
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A comparison of surrogate and real weeds: Do surrogate weeds accurately reflect real weeds across several flex-tine harrows? | 0 | 243 | February 16, 2021 | |
Evaluating the similarity of cruciferous surrogate weeds to the early development of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) | 0 | 364 | February 16, 2021 | |
Combining seedbank management and stacked cultivation tools to improve organic weed management | 0 | 237 | February 18, 2021 | |
Functionality and efficacy of Franklin Robotics’ Tertill™ robotic weeder | 0 | 236 | February 16, 2021 | |
Using LIDAR to Characterize Soil Roughness for Physical Weed Control Research | 0 | 251 | February 26, 2021 |